Their fit and finish are higher, but because of their tighter fit, they are not quite as suitable for lengthy listening periods as the Solo3. Suppose you do not care about ANC and would rather have more transportable. beats flex review Longer-lasting Bluetooth headphones for regular usage, the Solo3 is better than the Solo Pro. When we tried it out, we noticed that the issue with them is that they might slip off if you jog frequently.
It also puts the headphones in pairing mode if you hold it down. Both Apple and Beats have benefited greatly from their relationship over the last five years. Since Apple bought the headphone company in 2014, Beats has improved its gear on all fronts, from design to audio quality and even adding useful features.
The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Beats Solo Wireless are headphones with different strengths and depending on your usages, you may prefer one over the other. They feel better built, their sound profile is more neutral, and they have a great ANC to help cut down ambient noise around you. However, the Solo have a better battery performance and a bass-heavy sound profile, which some users may like. They’re better-suited for sports too as their fit is more stable. With the Solo Pro headphones, Beats essentially takes the popular Solo3 Wireless and adds active noise cancellation . At $299.95, they’re priced to compete with top noise-cancelling models like the Bose Noise Cancelling Headphones 700.
The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and theSkullcandy Push Active True Wirelesshave different strengths, and you may prefer either one. The Beats are on-ear headphones with a better build quality and a more neutral sound profile, which some users may prefer. They also have a very good noise isolation performance, thanks to their ANC system, a longer continuous battery life, and an H1 chip for seamless pairing with your Apple devices. However, the Skullcandy are in-ears that are more comfortable and have a stable ear-hook design, making them a solid choice for sports. Their companion app also offers a graphic EQ and presets to help you adjust their sound as well as smart commands. The Beats Solo Pro Wireless and the Turtle Beach Recon 500 are designed for different purposes.
The Beats are more suitable for casual use as they’re closed-back headphones with an active noise cancelling feature, which can reduce a great amount of noise around you. They also have a wireless design, a more neutral sound profile than the Focal, and an H1 chip for seamless pairing with Apple devices. The Focal, in comparison, are audiophile headphones with superior comfort and build quality. They also have more consistent audio delivery and their passive soundstage seems more spacious and immersive. Thanks to their wired design, they have negligible latency, too. The SteelSeries Arctis 9X Wireless and the are designed for different purposes.
When comparing the midrange of these two headphones, the Beats Solo Pro comes out on top, and its mids are somewhat more direct and precise than the competition. In the case of Beats Solo 3, the highs are a little bland, but they’re still accurate. The best part is that sharpness and sibilance will not be an issue while listening to high-pitched singers and equipment records.
And if you want anything nice, you’ll have to make some sacrifices. Furthermore, the microprocessor guarantees that the headphones last better and provide great sound when linked to an iPhone. On the other hand, the Beats Solo Pro offers a very balanced audio signature suited for a wide range of musical styles.